Neutral Attraction

Me at the Cowdrey Lecture.

Me at the Cowdrey Lecture.

I went to listen to Simon Taufel at the Spirit of Cricket Cowdrey Lecture last week (http://www.lords.org/news/2013/july/taufel-delivers-mcc-spirit-of-cricket-cowdrey-lecture/).  He had some pretty interesting things to say about umpiring, it really made me think about how difficult it must be, especially with all those cameras on you looking for your next mistake!  He talked a bit about neutral umpiring, quite a recent development in the international game (1994).  Of course at club level, where finding a volunteer to umpire at all can be difficult, neutral umpiring rarely happens.  Most of the clubs I’ve visited haven’t had too much trouble with umpire bias, although this story offers a possible exception – http://www.takingthefield.com/stories/1960s-club-bowling-legend-bert-davies-and-7-lbws-one-innings – the story features an umpire who gave his son-in-law 7 successful LBW appeals in one innings, but perhaps he was just bowling particularly well that day!  The point Simon Taufel made wasn’t that umpires would be biased towards their own countries, but that neutral umpiring was important as it took away that suspicion.

Mike Gatting and Eoin Morgan joined Simon Taufel on stage for questions after his lecture.  Mike Gatting was a particularly interesting choice of speaker as he was involved in a major controversy involving umpiring a few years before neutral umpiring was made compulsory.  The incident occurred in December 1987, England were playing the 2nd test of the series against Pakistan in Faisalabad.  There had been tension during the day when Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana had rejected a bat pad appeal, but things did not escalate until the last over of the day.  Shakoor Rana accused Mike Gatting of moving a fielder after the bowler had begun his run up in order to distract the batsman.  Gatting disagreed and an angry exchange of swearwords and aggressive gestures from both parties was the result (all observed on camera and broadcast across the world!).

37593

Photographer Graham Morris captures the moment – an image that was seen around the world.

Both parties retreated to their ‘camps’ and overnight it was established that Shakoor would refuse to stand the next day without an apology and that Gatting would not apologies unless Shakoor apologised too for his part in the incident.  Neither would budge and so the third day of play was abandoned.

On the evening of what would have been the third day Gatting received instruction from the TCCB in London that he should apologies, which he duly did reluctantly in the form of a short hand written note.

Dear Shakoor  Rana, I apologize for the bad language used during the second day of the Test match at Faisalabad.  Mike Gatting.

And so the match was able to continue and ended in a draw (which was perhaps the best outcome in the circumstances).

In most other sports an argument between a player and official on the pitch would not be so much of a big deal, but respect for the umpire has always been seen as vital to the spirit of cricket.  The event had a big impact on the cricketing world and renewed pleas for neutral umpires.

The idea of total respect for umpires is an interesting concept and one many cricketers were raised with as children.   Yet umpires are only human and do make mistakes, and where does the ideal leave DRS, a process that involves players challenging the umpires decision?  Simon’s lecture didn’t really answer this questions and the role of the umpire will probably go on being discussed for as long as cricket is played (even after they’ve all been replaced by hawkeye/hotspot enabled robots!)

MCCPHO01898

Advertisements

8 Comments

Filed under cheating, Cricket, DRS, England, History, Mike Gatting, neutral umpires, Pakistan, Simon Taufel, test cricket, Umpiring, umpiring

8 responses to “Neutral Attraction

  1. I like the idea of DRS but the implementation has led to it being used in ways other than intended. The pressure to win on team captains is immense, so it is no wonder that they use DRS speculatively rather than to challenge an absolute howler of a decision. Each team having two reviews seems to have exasperated the situation further.

  2. Oops! Pressed enter too quickly. I’d like to see just one review per team. What would help, and what seems to be happening by default anyway, is taking the front foot no-ball away from the on field umpire and given to the 3rd umpire. that would enable those on field to concentrate more on what is happening at the other end.

    • I agree that DRS is being used in the wrong way. The trouble is everyone seems to expect the players to give it a go – the commentators often say “He may as well review that as he’s still got a view left” or something to that effect. I sort of wonder if it might be better to give players unlimited reviews BUT make it clear that it for howlers only, using it consistently inappropriately could then result it penalties like match bans or loss of fee. I do also miss that wonderful moment at the end of a match where the umpire slowly raises his finger for the last batsmen – everyone celebrates – then the batsman reviews it – the commentators say “well he might as well” – and a little of the magic of the moment is lost.

      • Sadly, I don’t believe we will see that magic moment return. Even if a team doesn’t review the decision, the Umpires tend to review potential wickets to see if it was a front foot no ball. The other point is that it potentially adds to to the drama when watching on TV, and they are, after all, the paymasters.

      • Well I watch on TV and I don’t like it! It’s so not fair that my opinion isn’t their priority!

  3. Respect to Umpires is even more of a myth than the ‘Spirit of Cricket’ when walking. The only sport where the referee is respected seems to be Rugby. Other than that I don’t know of a single club cricketer who doesn’t appeal if he thinks it might not be out. I don’t know of anyone who hasn’t shown dissent of some form to an Umpire who has given a shocker either; I’ve even done it myself, and I’m as affable as they come!

    • Very naughty of you! I don’t follow rugby – I wonder what makes that sport different?

      • Give an inch, they’ll take a mile…I think from the start rugby clamped down on even the most minor dissent. If someone other than the captain even talks to the ref they can get sinbinned…Or maybe as it stayed an amateur sport for longer it was able to better bring the public school boy ethos into modern sport? Or maybe I dunno.

        But yeah, since the days of WG Grace and probably before, cricketers have long been arseholes!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s