In my latest TTF story Barry Dennis tells us about a joke suggesting that his cricket team, Wimbledon CC, is rather posh (http://www.takingthefield.com/stories/joining-yahs). But is cricket in general posh?
Growing up I always thought so. We didn’t play cricket at my school, it was something that was played at posh schools or by the posh boys in Enid Blyton books.
Having visited a couple of cricket clubs now I realise not all cricketers are posh, some of the people I’ve met have been very common (ha ha only joking), but they have been what I regard as normal. So where does the posh image come from? Does it depend on whether or not your school teaches cricket? Is there a north/south divide? Is it because cricket spectators seem so much better behaved than those at the football (even though attending football is much more expensive)? Is it down to the appearance of those immaculate cricket whites? I would be genuinely interested to hear your views.
Although I admit my childhood impression was not entirely correct – I think it had some basis in reality. For example, 7 out of 11 of the England test team who played in the last test were privately educated, that’s pretty high when you consider only 7% of the population attend private schools. So is there something ‘posh’ about cricket?