Me at the Cowdrey Lecture.
I went to listen to Simon Taufel at the Spirit of Cricket Cowdrey Lecture last week (http://www.lords.org/news/2013/july/taufel-delivers-mcc-spirit-of-cricket-cowdrey-lecture/). He had some pretty interesting things to say about umpiring, it really made me think about how difficult it must be, especially with all those cameras on you looking for your next mistake! He talked a bit about neutral umpiring, quite a recent development in the international game (1994). Of course at club level, where finding a volunteer to umpire at all can be difficult, neutral umpiring rarely happens. Most of the clubs I’ve visited haven’t had too much trouble with umpire bias, although this story offers a possible exception – http://www.takingthefield.com/stories/1960s-club-bowling-legend-bert-davies-and-7-lbws-one-innings – the story features an umpire who gave his son-in-law 7 successful LBW appeals in one innings, but perhaps he was just bowling particularly well that day! The point Simon Taufel made wasn’t that umpires would be biased towards their own countries, but that neutral umpiring was important as it took away that suspicion.
Mike Gatting and Eoin Morgan joined Simon Taufel on stage for questions after his lecture. Mike Gatting was a particularly interesting choice of speaker as he was involved in a major controversy involving umpiring a few years before neutral umpiring was made compulsory. The incident occurred in December 1987, England were playing the 2nd test of the series against Pakistan in Faisalabad. There had been tension during the day when Pakistani umpire Shakoor Rana had rejected a bat pad appeal, but things did not escalate until the last over of the day. Shakoor Rana accused Mike Gatting of moving a fielder after the bowler had begun his run up in order to distract the batsman. Gatting disagreed and an angry exchange of swearwords and aggressive gestures from both parties was the result (all observed on camera and broadcast across the world!).
Photographer Graham Morris captures the moment – an image that was seen around the world.
Both parties retreated to their ‘camps’ and overnight it was established that Shakoor would refuse to stand the next day without an apology and that Gatting would not apologies unless Shakoor apologised too for his part in the incident. Neither would budge and so the third day of play was abandoned.
On the evening of what would have been the third day Gatting received instruction from the TCCB in London that he should apologies, which he duly did reluctantly in the form of a short hand written note.
Dear Shakoor Rana, I apologize for the bad language used during the second day of the Test match at Faisalabad. Mike Gatting.
And so the match was able to continue and ended in a draw (which was perhaps the best outcome in the circumstances).
In most other sports an argument between a player and official on the pitch would not be so much of a big deal, but respect for the umpire has always been seen as vital to the spirit of cricket. The event had a big impact on the cricketing world and renewed pleas for neutral umpires.
The idea of total respect for umpires is an interesting concept and one many cricketers were raised with as children. Yet umpires are only human and do make mistakes, and where does the ideal leave DRS, a process that involves players challenging the umpires decision? Simon’s lecture didn’t really answer this questions and the role of the umpire will probably go on being discussed for as long as cricket is played (even after they’ve all been replaced by hawkeye/hotspot enabled robots!)
Filed under cheating, Cricket, DRS, England, History, Mike Gatting, neutral umpires, Pakistan, Simon Taufel, test cricket, Umpiring, umpiring
It our latest TTF story David Cole from Ovington CC talks about the bad behaviour from drunken spectators including streaking http://www.takingthefield.com/stories/pitch-invasion-part-one . When I visited in May I was told to expect at least one streaker as there was a big race weekend on in York and there would be lots of jolly drunks heading home from the races and coming across the ground. I was quite excited and had my camera finger at the ready all afternoon – but they must have been feeling shy that day as I was to be disappointment. Anyway, my disappointment got me thinking about the history of streaking at cricket matches. I’ve been surprised to find very little material (ha ha, that’s almost a pun) here in the MCC library – perhaps it’s because no one wants to encourage streakers by making them famous.
I was surprised the learn that the first recorded cricket streaker was as late as 1975 – I would have thought it a much longer tradition (ha ha…no, that one’s very weak, just forget it). I don’t know if it was televised, but the moment was immortalised by John Arlott on the radio commentary –
“My goodness me, we’ve got an intruder from underneath Father Time in the person of a strapping young man rippling with muscles. the most remarkable thing about him is that he does not have any clothes on.
There he goes, striding out towards the middle to what I can only describe as the puzzled delight of a big crowd.
He’s making for the wicket at the Nursery End and umpire Tom Spencer doesn’t quite know what to do. Ooh, would you believe it, he jumps the stumps! But all’s well, umpire Spencer hasn’t signalled ‘one short’.
And now the amply proportioned young man goes galloping away towards the Mound Stand with his arms outsretched, showing 25,000 people something they’ve never seen before.
And now a young copper comes across and spoils it all. he’s taken off his helmet, placed it over the offending weapon and now he leads the young man off the field to a night in the cells and a visit to the Marylebone Magistrates Court in the morning”
It sounds as though John Arlott rather enjoyed it, probably because this was the first streak it was something of a novelty. I think the novelty wore off quite quickly though and they are now regarded as just a nuisance.
Streakers have become a bore and are treated rather more harshly these days.
Alastair Cook trudges back to the dressing room after a bad lbw decision.
The debate over what to do about bad umpiring is rife again today after Cook was given out lbw to a ball that was heading wide of off stump. DRS might have saved him, but is it really the answer? DRS was introduced to reduce umpire errors but only seems to have stimulated more arguments over its effectiveness and it’s effect on the flow of the game. It is not being used in the current India v. England test series and in a recent blog Mike Selvey argues that it has made the quality if umpiring worse (http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/blog/2012/dec/03/india-england-drs-umpires-worse ). And what about cricket at other levels? Can the Counties afford DRS? What about club cricket where even providing neutral umpiring can be a challenge in small towns where everyone knows everyone (listen to Montgomery CC members talking about the match where an umpire gave 7 batsmen out lbw in one innings off his son-in-law’s bowling! http://www.takingthefield.com/stories/1960s-club-bowling-legend-bert-davies-and-7-lbws-one-innings).
But fear not cricket fans! My colleague Alan Rees has discovered the answer to umpiring woes buried deep in the archive. I present…The Denton Plan!
As you can see the plan is pretty detailed and I couldn’t quite fit it all on my scanner, but I hope this gives you the gist. Basically the only way a batman can be out is run out or bowled – Bat v. ball is the Denton mantra. This plan was received by the MCC in 1965 and was surprisingly rejected as it was felt it would received little favour from cricket fans, but what do you think? Denton believed it would not only solve all umpiring problems but would also make the game more exciting.
Here he lays out all the problems the Denton Plan will solve. (Problems he claims are mostly caused by Australians!)
I have to admit that I’m not entirely convinced. It might make cricket simpler but the potential complexity of the game is one of the reasons I fell in love with it. I like a good relaxing draw now and then, I even enjoy bad umpiring decisions deep down – they give you something to discuss and get angry about! Let me know what you think, could this be the future?